View uci-20070111 tic-tac-toe (public)

2010-11-06 09:58 by mldata | Version 1 | Rating Empty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty Star
Rating
Empty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty Star Overall (based on 0 votes)
Empty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty Star Interesting
Empty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty Star Documentation
Summary

(No information yet)

License
unknown (from Weka repository)
Dependencies
Tags
arff slurped Weka
Attribute Types
String
Download
# Instances: 958 / # Attributes: 10
HDF5 (393.8 KB) XML CSV ARFF LibSVM Matlab Octave

Files are converted on demand and the process can take up to a minute. Please wait until download begins.

Completeness of this item currently: 55%.
You can edit this item to add more meta information and make use of the site's premium features.
Original Data Format
arff
Name
tic-tac-toe
Version mldata
0
Comment
  1. Title: Tic-Tac-Toe Endgame database

  2. Source Information -- Creator: David W. Aha (aha@cs.jhu.edu) -- Donor: David W. Aha (aha@cs.jhu.edu) -- Date: 19 August 1991

  3. Known Past Usage:

  4. Matheus,~C.~J., & Rendell,~L.~A. (1989). Constructive induction on decision trees. In {it Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence} (pp. 645--650). Detroit, MI: Morgan Kaufmann. -- CITRE was applied to 100-instance training and 200-instance test sets. In a study using various amounts of domain-specific knowledge, its highest average accuracy was 76.7% (using the final decision tree created for testing).

  5. Matheus,~C.~J. (1990). Adding domain knowledge to SBL through feature construction. In {it Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence} (pp. 803--808). Boston, MA: AAAI Press. -- Similar experiments with CITRE, includes learning curves up to 500-instance training sets but used all instances in the database for testing. Accuracies reached above 90%, but specific values are not given (see Chris's dissertation for more details).

  6. Aha,~D.~W. (1991). Incremental constructive induction: An instance-based approach. In {it Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Machine Learning} (pp. 117--121). Evanston, ILL: Morgan Kaufmann. -- Used 70% for training, 30% of the instances for testing, evaluated over 10 trials. Results reported for six algorithms: -- NewID: 84.0% -- CN2: 98.1%
    -- MBRtalk: 88.4% -- IB1: 98.1% -- IB3: 82.0% -- IB3-CI: 99.1% -- Results also reported when adding an additional 10 irrelevant ternary-valued attributes; similar relative results except that IB1's performance degraded more quickly than the others.

  7. Relevant Information:

This database encodes the complete set of possible board configurations at the end of tic-tac-toe games, where "x" is assumed to have played first. The target concept is "win for x" (i.e., true when "x" has one of 8 possible ways to create a "three-in-a-row").

Interestingly, this raw database gives a stripped-down decision tree algorithm (e.g., ID3) fits. However, the rule-based CN2 algorithm, the simple IB1 instance-based learning algorithm, and the CITRE feature-constructing decision tree algorithm perform well on it.

  1. Number of Instances: 958 (legal tic-tac-toe endgame boards)

  2. Number of Attributes: 9, each corresponding to one tic-tac-toe square

  3. Attribute Information: (x=player x has taken, o=player o has taken, b=blank)

    1. top-left-square: {x,o,b}
    2. top-middle-square: {x,o,b}
    3. top-right-square: {x,o,b}
    4. middle-left-square: {x,o,b}
    5. middle-middle-square: {x,o,b}
    6. middle-right-square: {x,o,b}
    7. bottom-left-square: {x,o,b}
    8. bottom-middle-square: {x,o,b}
    9. bottom-right-square: {x,o,b}
  4. Class: {positive,negative}

  5. Missing Attribute Values: None

  6. Class Distribution: About 65.3% are positive (i.e., wins for "x")

Information about the dataset CLASSTYPE: nominal CLASSINDEX: last

Names
top-left-square,top-middle-square,top-right-square,middle-left-square,middle-middle-square,middle-right-square,bottom-left-square,bottom-middle-square,bottom-right-square,Class,
Types
  1. nominal:b,o,x
  2. nominal:b,o,x
  3. nominal:b,o,x
  4. nominal:b,o,x
  5. nominal:b,o,x
  6. nominal:b,o,x
  7. nominal:b,o,x
  8. nominal:b,o,x
  9. nominal:b,o,x
  10. nominal:negative,positive
Data (first 10 data points)
    top-... top-... top-... midd... midd... midd... bott... bott... bott... Class
    x x x x o o x o o posi...
    x x x x o o o x o posi...
    x x x x o o o o x posi...
    x x x x o o o b b posi...
    x x x x o o b o b posi...
    x x x x o o b b o posi...
    x x x x o b o o b posi...
    x x x x o b o b o posi...
    x x x x o b b o o posi...
    x x x x b o o o b posi...
    ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Description

A gzip'ed tar containing UCI and UCI KDD datasets (uci-20070111.tar.gz, 17,952,832 Bytes)

URLs
(No information yet)
Publications
    Data Source
    http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html http://kdd.ics.uci.edu/
    Measurement Details
    Usage Scenario
    revision 1
    by mldata on 2010-11-06 09:58

    No one has posted any comments yet. Perhaps you would like to be the first?

    Leave a comment

    To post a comment, please sign in.

    This item was downloaded 3162 times and viewed 2080 times.

    No Tasks yet on dataset uci-20070111 tic-tac-toe

    Submit a new Task for this Data item

    Data

    Sort by

    Disclaimer

    We are acting in good faith to make datasets submitted for the use of the scientific community available to everybody, but if you are a copyright holder and would like us to remove a dataset please inform us and we will do it as soon as possible.

    Data | Task | Method | Challenge

    Acknowledgements

    This project is supported by PASCAL (Pattern Analysis, Statistical Modelling and Computational Learning)
    PASCAL Logo
    http://www.pascal-network.org/.